plus
Home > Case Study > Improving anti-coagulant prescribing in Warrington

Improving anti-coagulant prescribing in Warrington

Our review of anti-coagulant prescribing improved patient safety and reduced costs.

Background:
Direct oral anti-coagulants (DOAC) have now increased greatly as one treatment choice over the alternative warfarin. This is because they do not require the intense monitoring needed for warfarin. Patients on a DOAC will only require more routine monitoring once a year or every three months, depending on their renal function. Risks that need to be considered with taking a DOAC include under or over coagulation and continuing treatment for longer than necessary. It is important to check that those prescribed for atrial fibrillation (AF) are correctly read-coded to be on the AF register for their practice in order to ensure correct follow up.

Action:
In each Warrington practice, our MMO team conducted a review of all patients taking any of the four DOAC medicines currently prescribed across the CCG. They looked specifically at the risk factors with DOACs. These included indication, dose and duration of therapy, as patients may remain on the incorrect dose for the indication or a longer treatment length than necessary. Duration of treatment, and stop dates for courses, were documented in patient notes. Patients’ renal function and weight was reviewed for dose prescribed and amended as appropriate.

The team checked any drug interactions and also for appropriateness of medication for indication/risk factors ensuring the clinical indication was clearly documented by read code in the GP system.

For this project, the team created bespoke searches and numerical filters to show all existing values relating to DOAC monitoring.

Impact:
The DOAC review was started in March 2018 across 27 GP practices in Warrington. The table below shows the interventions that were made by the MMO team:

Number of Patients in total from Searches on DOAC Number of patients currently on appropriate dose (at time of audit) Average % patients on appropriate dose Number of patients that require missing or appropriate Read code Number of patients that require treatment stopping or a dose reduction Number of patients that require dose increase
2426 2059 85% 116 (4.8%) 114 (4.7%) 21 (0.9%)

In addition to the safety aspect of this work there were £9,000 cost savings made in total.

Get in touch

Kingston House

438-450 High Street
West Bromwich
West Midlands
B70 9LD

0121 612 1500
  • Heron House
  • Springfields Health & Wellbeing Centre

Midlands and Lancashire CSU
120 Grove Road
Stoke on Trent
ST4 4LX

0300 404 2999

Midlands and Lancashire CSU
1st Floor
Lovett Court
Rugeley
WS15 2QD

0300 404 2999
Jubilee House

Midlands and Lancashire CSU
Lancashire Business Park
Leyland
Lancashire
PR26 6TR

01772 214200
Liverpool Innovation Park

Office 2
2nd Floor
Building 2
Liverpool Innovation Park
360 Edge Lane
L7 9NJ

0151 295 8612/8619
  • 1829 Building, Chester
  • Old Market House
  • Clark House

1829 Building
Countess of Chester Health Park
Liverpool Road

01244 650 351

Hamilton Street
Birkenhead
Merseyside
CH41 5AL

0151 514 2335 EXT 1487

Hulley Road
Macclesfiled
Cheshire
SK10 2LU

01606 544 791
Cardinal Square

3rd Floor North Point,
10 Nottingham Road,
Derby DE1 3QT
East Midlands

01332 868700
St Johns House

St Johns House
30 East Street
Leicester
Leicestershire
LE1 6NB
United Kingdom

0121 611 0100
map